What Does Being a Player-Coach Mean at Work?
The term “player-coach” originated in sports, describing a team member who simultaneously plays and coaches. Historically, it wasn’t just a title — it was a winning formula: the first six Baseball World Series were claimed by player-coaches, and Bill Russell led the Boston Celtics to two NBA championships while filling both roles. While the dual role has largely disappeared in professional sports, the concept of being a player-coach at work is very much alive.
Today, many organizations expect managers — particularly first-level leaders — to embody the player-coach mindset: actively contributing to the work while guiding, mentoring, and developing their team.
Many experts argue that excelling as both an individual contributor and a people leader is nearly impossible. Yet organizations continue to expect their high-performing, high-potential employees to do exactly that. Player-coaches must navigate the dual challenge of delivering their own projects while ensuring their team operates at peak performance. Wearing both hats is demanding — and it’s a skill few master without intentional focus and support.
The Biggest Challenge for People Managers
For decades, we’ve asked thousands of managers in our new manager training programs to identify their greatest challenges. Consistently, the role of being a player-coach at work ranks among the top five.
When managers describe what this dual role means to them, they cite examples like leading a project team while completing their own tasks, managing a sales team while meeting personal sales quotas, or stocking store shelves while serving customers. While combining hands-on work with leadership can create efficiencies, it also introduces distinct challenges.
Before adopting a player-coach approach, it’s critical to evaluate whether it makes sense for your organization — and for each individual situation.
What Organizations Expect from Managers
When we ask business leaders about management, three expectations consistently rise to the top:
Excelling as a player-coach at work is no easy feat. Balancing responsibilities for team strategy, culture, and talent while also handling individual contributor work can quickly become overwhelming. Sports provide a cautionary tale: the dual role has largely disappeared because even top athletes struggled to coach effectively at the same time. The NBA, for example, found that player-coaches were unable to meet the demands of coaching while still performing on the court — a concern that resonates for business leaders navigating the same challenge.
When the Player-Coach at Work Model Works
When executed effectively, combining leadership with hands-on contribution can streamline organizational hierarchies, enhance communication, accelerate decision-making, and leverage deep technical or subject-matter expertise. The player-coach approach makes sense in situations where:
How to Set Up Your Player-Coaches for Success
To ensure your doer-managers operate at peak effectiveness while guiding their teams to higher performance, consider these key aspects of the player-coach scenario:
Recognize that balancing personal deliverables with team responsibilities requires trade-offs. Provide context for prioritizing initiatives, making tough decisions, and allocating resources across projects.
Invest time in a process that allows teams to continuously review and adjust priorities, reassess scope and timelines, and rebalance work to leverage individual strengths and capacity.
Finally, don’t assume managers or their teams will ask for help when needed. Check in regularly and create an environment where seeking support is expected, encouraged, and easy.
Healthy Enough: Foster leadership, trust, capability, and a positive work climate.
Performance-Oriented Enough: Set clear expectations, and align rewards and consequences with results.
Strategically Aligned Enough: Ensure the way work gets done is consistent across the ten key dimensions of an aligned culture.
Not everyone is cut out to be a manager — and even fewer excel as player-coaches. As one client observed, “some people are just better at being players.”
Whenever possible, assess and invest in employees’ leadership potential to predict readiness for key roles. Doing so ensures decisions are based on willingness and capability rather than personal preference or unconscious bias.
The Bottom Line
People manager assessment center data finds that most managers struggle to find the right balance between managing and doing. Too much “managing” does not always produce visible results or leverage subject matter expertise, and too much “doing” does not always help to scale you or your team to the next level of performance. Are your player-coaches set up for success?
To learn more about being a better player-coach, download 3 Must-Have Ingredients of High Performing Teams for Managers to Get Right
Explore real world results for clients like you striving to create higher performance