Define Success at Work: An Essential Ingredient for High Performance
We believe one of a leader’s most important responsibilities is to create the conditions for people to perform at their peak. Our leadership simulation assessment data consistently reinforces a deceptively simple leadership practice:
Take the time to clearly define success at work before you ask people to deliver it.
When leaders fail to clarify what success — and failure — actually looks like, they create more than strategic ambiguity. Corporate culture assessment research tells us that they increase the risk of:
Most organizations define high-level corporate outcomes such as revenue growth, profitability, customer loyalty, or employee engagement. Far fewer translate those outcomes into a clear picture of what success looks like for each team and role.
That is a costly omission.
Imagine running a marathon without knowing the winning time, where your competitors are, how far you have traveled, or whether you are ahead or behind pace. You could work incredibly hard and still have no idea whether you are performing well.
The same is true at work. People cannot consistently perform at their peak when the finish line is unclear.
Clarity as a Catalyst for Alignment
Our organizational alignment research found that strategic clarity accounts for 31% of the difference between high and low performance in terms of revenue growth, profitability, customer satisfaction, leadership effectiveness, and employee engagement.
The ability to define success at work gives people the precision required to align daily decisions and priorities with broader business strategies and their personal growth objectives.
Without that clarity, even talented and highly motivated employees can pull in different directions. Everyone may be working hard — just not necessarily working together toward the outcomes that matter most.
When success and failure are clearly defined through a combination of quantitative strategy success metrics and qualitative behavioral expectations, they become a North Star for:
Clear expectations create useful guardrails. People understand what they must accomplish to be considered high performers and which behaviors or results represent unacceptable performance.
Motivation Rooted in Meaning
Project postmortem data shows that employees want to understand why their work matters.
When people can see how their contribution connects to meaningful business outcomes — and understand how their success will be measured and recognized — they are more likely to take ownership of their performance.
Vague expectations such as “do your best,” “increase sales,” or “be more strategic” rarely provide enough direction or accountability to improve performance.
Compare that with expectations such as:
Specificity transforms aspiration into action.
Psychological Safety Requires Clear Performance Expectations
People want to know where they stand.
When leaders do not define success at work, employees are forced to fill in the blanks. Those assumptions can lead to unnecessary anxiety, overwork, competing agendas, and confusion about whether performance is meeting expectations — the exact opposite of psychological team safety.
Clear expectations, especially when reinforced through regular feedback, create a more secure foundation for learning, accountability, and growth.
Well-defined performance expectations:
Clarity should not constrain people. Done correctly, clarity creates the boundaries within which people can operate with greater autonomy and confidence.
Cultural Consistency Across the Organization
Organizational culture, how work gets done, is shaped by the behaviors that leaders model, expect, reward, tolerate, and discourage.
That makes defining success at work an important component of shaping a high-performance culture.
When definitions of success include both what people must accomplish and how they are expected to accomplish it, abstract corporate values become tangible workplace expectations.
This also creates greater consistency across functions. Without shared definitions of organizational success, departments can inadvertently optimize for their own goals at the expense of enterprise performance.
Sales may pursue revenue that operations cannot profitably deliver. Finance may optimize costs in ways that undermine customer experience. Individual business units may protect their own priorities instead of collaborating toward shared goals.
A common definition of success helps everyone play for the same scoreboard.
Better Performance and Development Conversations
Defining success is not just about measuring results. It creates the foundation for more meaningful conversations about performance and development.
Our people manager assessment center data reinforces the importance of precise, consistent feedback for improving performance and engagement.
When expectations are explicit, managers and employees can more objectively discuss:
Performance management can then shift from a backward-looking report card to a forward-looking conversation about improving career growth and results.
To define what success looks like at work in a meaningful way, leaders must:
The answer should connect directly to the company’s strategic priorities and the expectations of key stakeholders. Everyone should understand what constitutes high performance for their role and team.
Typically, two or three meaningful measures are more powerful than a sprawling dashboard of KPIs.
Employees should understand both Doing — the results they must deliver — and Being — the attitudes, behaviors, ethics, and values expected while delivering those results.
A sales executive, software engineer, finance leader, and HR business partner contribute value differently. Each role operates within a distinct set of circumstances, stakeholders, and strategic requirements.
Define high performance and the corresponding success metrics at a level specific enough to guide everyday decisions.
Too much or too little pressure can negatively affect productivity, engagement, decision making, and innovation. Involve employees in defining what success and failure look like whenever possible.
Co-creation improves relevance, exposes unrealistic assumptions, and increases the buy-in alignment, and commitment required for execution.
Customer expectations change. Markets shift. Strategies evolve. New competitors emerge.
Establish a cadence of accountability that regularly tests whether individual and team expectations remain aligned with strategic priorities and market realities.
Examples of Success Definitions and Success Metrics
The goal is to create clarity, focus, alignment, and commitment. Start by asking what outcomes would represent undisputed success to your most important stakeholders. Then identify the simplest measures that would prove those outcomes were achieved.
Success Metrics
Fill 100% of forecasted critical positions within 90 days with people possessing the required capabilities and achieve a 95% employee engagement rating in their first 6 months.
Success Metrics
Deliver accurate, timely, and transparent financial data and achieve 95% satisfaction among key internal stakeholders.
Success Metrics
Grow the top 10 accounts by 25% and win 10 new target accounts.
The Bottom Line
In high-performing cultures, leaders define success at work before asking people to deliver it. Clear definitions of success and failure create a shared scoreboard that aligns priorities, strengthens accountability, improves decision making, and gives people the confidence to act. The question for leaders is straightforward: If you asked every employee what high performance looks like in their role — and how they know whether they are winning or losing — would you get clear and consistent answers? If not, the finish line needs greater clarity.
Want to know how hard to push your team without undermining engagement or performance? Download The Science of Performance Pressure: How Hard Should Leaders Push Their Teams? to learn how to create the right level of pressure for higher performance.
Tristam Brown is an executive business consultant and organizational development expert with more than three decades of experience helping organizations accelerate performance, build high-impact teams, and turn strategy into execution. As CEO of LSA Global, he works with leaders to get and stay aligned™ through research-backed strategy, culture, and talent solutions that produce measurable, business-critical results. See full bio.
Feb 11,2019
13 K
Apr 18,2017
11 K
Nov 20,2016
6 K
Oct 02,2017
6 K
Explore real world results for clients like you striving to create higher performance
