Ready Now High Performing LeadersClient Case Study
Situation: Medical Technology Leadership Development Impact
For many enterprise L&D leaders, the hardest question isn’t how to develop leaders — it’s how to prove that development actually makes a difference.
A global medical technology company ($6.5B in revenue with 30,000 employees) faced this exact challenge within its Emerging Leaders Program. Like many large organizations, it had invested significantly in leadership development initiatives designed to strengthen its leadership pipeline and prepare high-potential talent for broader responsibilities.
Yet one issue persisted: demonstrating measurable impact. While participants reported positive experiences and managers believed the program was valuable, the organization lacked clear evidence that leaders were actually changing their behaviors and improving their effectiveness on the job.
Leadership development was happening — but the organization wanted to know whether it was translating into real performance improvement.
To address this gap, the company decided to implement a proven simulation-based leadership development and reassessment approach. The goal was to make leadership capability both observable and measurable over time, allowing the organization to track whether development efforts were truly strengthening leadership performance.
Complications
The organization’s training strategy was evolving. Like many enterprises, it wanted to move beyond one-time assessments, self-reported feedback, and traditional classroom training that often measure learning but not behavior change. Specifically, the company needed a more rigorous way to accomplish four objectives at scale with high levels of valididty:
The organization also wanted the development experience to be broadly relevant across functions and geographies. Participants came from diverse roles, so the approach needed to focus on core leadership behaviors rather than job-specific technical expertise.
Equally important, the company wanted leaders to experience situations that closely resembled real workplace challenges — difficult conversations, competing priorities, and ambiguous decision-making scenarios — without the risk associated with practicing those skills for the first time on the job.
Finally, the organization sought a way to reassess participants months after the initial development experience. Without follow-up measurement, it was nearly impossible to determine whether leaders had actually applied what they learned or whether the program had produced lasting change.
In short, the organization wanted more than insight. It wanted credible evidence of progress — clear signals that leaders were strengthening the behaviors that drive performance, collaboration, and execution across the enterprise.
Approach: Medical Technology Leadership Development Impact
To strengthen leadership capability while generating measurable evidence of progress, the organization embedded a simulation-based development and measurement model directly into its Emerging Leaders Program. The design served both as a high-impact development experience and a structured way to track leadership growth over time.
Results: More “Ready Now” Leaders and Measurable Performance Gains
The training measurement conducted one year after the baseline simulation produced clear, defensible evidence of leadership development impact. Most notably, the data showed a meaningful increase in leadership readiness and measurable improvements in leadership performance across the cohort.
Together, these improvements signaled that leaders were not only becoming more capable individually, but also better equipped to influence teams, drive team alignment, and execute strategy in complex environments.
Explore real world results for clients like you striving to create higher performance
