Change Resistance
The idea that employees automatically resist change is a convenient myth. What people actually resist is confusion, perceived loss, and change that feels imposed rather than purposeful. In our change management simulations, participants quickly see that change resistance usually signals a gap in understanding or belief — not stubbornness. When employees do not clearly grasp why a change is happening, or when they conclude that the personal costs outweigh the benefits, resistance is a rational response. This is where honesty and transparency works with change management.
Most employees worry about the real implications of change: the extra effort required, their ability to learn new skills, and the unspoken fear of becoming less relevant — or expendable. Ignoring these concerns does not make them disappear; it drives them underground. High-performing change leaders surface these fears early and address them directly.
Successful change leadership goes beyond explaining the mechanics of the change. Leaders must ensure that people understand the purpose of the desired changes and believe that the change serves their interests as well as the organization’s. That belief is built through credible change communication, visible leadership behavior, and a clear link between the change and what employees value — competence, contribution, and security. When people understand the situation, trust the messenger, and feel respected in the process, resistance gives way to commitment.
Explaining Change
When leaders or organizations withhold critical information — whether it’s the loss of a major customer, the company’s financial challenges, or the departure of a key executive — employees instinctively fill in the gaps. Left to imagination, these gaps often become exaggerated stories fueled by fear, rumor, and speculation. Ironically, the resulting perceptions are usually far worse than reality, consuming energy and attention that could be directed toward productive work.
Effective change leadership goes beyond simply announcing updates; it requires explaining change. Leaders must ensure that employees understand not just what is happening, but why it is necessary. This involves clearly articulating the business rationale, the anticipated benefits, and the consequences of inaction. Honest communication sets a baseline, but transparency — the proactive sharing of both challenges and opportunities — builds trust and reduces uncertainty.
Top CEOs and change leaders recognize that speculation thrives in silence. They proactively surface information, address tough questions, and provide context that allows employees to make sense of the situation. By openly connecting the dots, they transform uncertainty into clarity, enabling the workforce to move from apprehension to informed engagement.
Resist the Temptation to Wait
Too often, leaders delay sharing information, fearing that employees will overreact to partial, complex, or difficult updates. Yet employees are far more perceptive and resilient than many leaders assume. In high-pressure environments, signals of change inevitably reach employees — through shifts in behavior, decision making, or priorities — whether leaders acknowledge them or not.
Behavioral science consistently shows that during periods of uncertainty, employees crave workplace transparency, honesty, and clear guidance. They notice when words and actions are misaligned, and alignment builds a sense of psychological team safety, inclusion, and trust. In other words, people don’t just want information; they want it delivered with consistency, context, and care.
This is why top change management consulting practices emphasize that it is the leader’s responsibility to frame change within a clear context. Providing context helps employees interpret the significance of events, make sense of their implications, and begin the emotional adjustment necessary for adaptation. In nearly every case, the benefits of proactive transparency — trust, engagement, and preparedness — far outweigh the risks of withholding information.
Effectively explaining change requires both honesty and transparency. Be as clear and straightforward as you can with your employees. They deserve to know as much as you do about how the change will affect them and their teams. Fill them in on:
Be prepared to answer tough questions succinctly, acknowledge the current situation, empathize with their concerns, and reinforce the urgency for change, meaningful benefits to them, and the concrete next steps.
Why share all this? Because honest, transparent communication inspires trust in your leadership. Trust is required to motivate and engage others. And as the level of trust in leadership rises, so does the likelihood of successful organizational change.
The Bottom Line
No organization can achieve lasting success without embracing the need to do things differently. People require clear, timely information to understand, process, and commit to new ways of working and thinking. When leading change, the most effective approach is to be consistently honest and transparent. Sharing the rationale, context, and implications of change early and often builds trust, reduces uncertainty, and enables employees to move from apprehension to engagement. In change management, transparency is not just a virtue — it is a strategic imperative.
To learn more about how to overcome the biggest obstacles to organizational change, download The 5 Change Perspectives that Leaders Must Get Right

Tristam Brown is an executive business consultant and organizational development expert with more than three decades of experience helping organizations accelerate performance, build high-impact teams, and turn strategy into execution. As CEO of LSA Global, he works with leaders to get and stay aligned™ through research-backed strategy, culture, and talent solutions that produce measurable, business-critical results. See full bio.
Explore real world results for clients like you striving to create higher performance