Measurement Case Studies /
Case Study (1)
Case Study: Measuring with No Control Group
Isolating the Impact of New Skills on
Win-Rate at a Professional Services Firm
This client trained their entire population over a short period of time, so we
did not have a "control group" of untrained people as a
basis of comparison. Instead, we isolated the difference
in win-rate using the LSA Definite Difference™ approach
to measurement.
Executive Summary
- Business Goals: increase the volume
of unit sold without sacrificing margins, improve strength of customer
relationships, grow revenue per
rep
- Performance Challenges: multiple new competitors had
entered the market,
lack of distinct value, frequent
RFPs - Improvements in volume, revenue, and margin
- 62.3% increase in monthly volume
(see Graph 1)
- 27.8% increase in monthly revenue
(see Graph 2)
- 2x the increase in margin
(see Graph 3)
- Significant improvements in strength
of customer relationships pre/post the training -
Marked improvements in the skills and strategies used in
sales negotiations
|
 Graph
1: Volume -
Pre/Post Pilot |
|
 Graph
2: Revenue -
Pre/Post Pilot |
Approach
We conducted a LSA Adoption Metric™
analysis to quantify the
effects of the pilot program when compared to three similar control groups.
-
Key measures: monthly revenue, volume (units
sold), and margin (discounting allowance)
-
Training: a two-day negotiation skills
training program from a leading supplier
-
Time frame: 3-5 months pre-training and
4-6 months post-training, depending on the group
-
Population: three control groups and three
trained groups were randomly selected and compared over the
same time frames, in the same markets, against the same
competitors, selling the same products
|
 Graph
3: Margin -
Pre/Post Pilot |
View additional
Measurement Case Studies.
If you would like to learn how our training measurement expertise has helped leading organizations across multiple industries quantify the impact of training and development, please
contact us.
|
